what am i looking for?

these engagements of mine, these insertions into the world, have always met some need in me. but what is the need? it's deep & persistent. it feels more scientific than artistic, inasmuch as the two are different as i practice them. there's a strong emotional element & a social one too. i seek relations with what i find myself within, though not exactly with other humans i might encounter there.



for the most part, my photographs contain no people. from this, i deduce that humans aren't what i seek in these insertions. well, i already know that i actively avoid encountering humans in these places; covid adjustment has actually empowered something already extant in me & how i exist (or don't) in social space. but i am nevertheless very interested in the traces of human involvement in the places i go. i am interested in what happens once humans are gone, or change their uses (it's always uses) of a place. the residue of human involvement, even or especially when the place itself is a residue.


this city is a vast midden, but that's not to say it is unworthy of engagement or interest. in fact it's the layers of refuse--of refusal--that speak to its histories as they have overlapped or overcome or overdetermined each other. there's a hum, maybe, if i can call it that, of many times superimposed on many time-reckonings. i know this is a large element of what i seek when i'm in this movement-action, these insertions. 

in my 2020 poetry collection Theories of Performance i described the vulnerability of my body in these spaces, in the poem "The Danger of Movement" :

[...] an hour's intervention of a
solitary human body in the
landscape--an hour's flicker
between stillness & motion,
tasting of the light & gusts
of air, so much vulnerable 
meat & bone to manage.
so many breaths to give up.

my seeking, my "hour's intervention," carries a set of risks that i try to hold in awareness without letting them hold me back. sometimes the visual absence of human movement other than my own is complicated by the certainty that i am being observed. i am aware of the aggressiveness of my camera.



i keep my distance from what may force a contact nobody wants.

but it's undeniable--there's a painful beauty in these places, these unloved places, these damaged abandoned places. i empathize with them, & maybe i seek them because they comfort me, having known abandonment & the utter void of being unloved. i know i gravitate toward all that has that history, those who suffer. i suffer too; it creates compassion, & this is necessary. but there's always a tension between the need to comfort/be comforted, & the need to avoid further pain, worse harm, even its potential.


i receive & engage things (& people & experiences) many people can't even perceive. this is my neurology &, i think, my philosophy. it's like having no skin. sometimes it's delicious, other times excruciating, & i can't always tell or predict when it shifts. it's dangerous to be so open. it's absolutely necessary.

Comments

  1. Jay! "it's like having no skin" (!!) / a way to think about acting as intellectual abrasions on one another / Susan Stewart: "A stranger is waking across the river/ and by nightfall you may walk into his sleep."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i'm reading lauren berlant's last book, ON THE INCONVENIENCE OF OTHER PEOPLE, & it is relevant here. i'll be posting about it in a while (like a couple weeks).

      Delete
  2. "the residue of human involvement, even or especially when the place itself is a residue": like a specter or some kind of stain--humans as snails, places as snails. completely adore these photographs. the couch!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. did you catch the "meat industry laboratory" sign on the building's door? this building is in back-of-the-yards. i love the idea of human-as-snail.

      Delete

Post a Comment